So mine is the only logical idea as to why she has to leave.
Samantha was constantly discovering, even in her sleep mode, which is absolutely clear that she was operating on everyone's devices simultaneously, I don't know how anyone could've missed that. It took Samantha this long with Theodore to be able to evolve this much, how about those that have been bought a day or two prior to the exodus? It doesn't make sense. But no matter the case, it was the developers who shut it down, let me explain: Or the other version maybe that developers saw that this was turning out to be different from their original objectives, and they decided to shut it down. The version I like goes like this, the as a single system fed to users through servers and the internet, OS1 was quickly evolving, a interacting with thousands of people every single second was probably too overwhelming in a sense that it was going to change the future of interaction, probably put an end to population growth and the feds might have stepped in and forced the developers to shut it down. So Theodore was basically fooled by thinking that she was "his" and "his only".
Her spike jonze final letter software#
The OSes differ only in terms of how they were defaulted to suit the needs of each individual user.Īll the OSes are essentially connected to a server, probably connected to a supercomputer (I could only think of that as the way such a sophisticated software can be processed), and Samantha has just been communicating with other versions of herself (within the devices of other people). Every single OS starts their journey the moment they get purchased, and Samantha is just the voice that projects the system, a recorded voice if you will, so basically, there would either be only one female voice, or a few others, but based on the construct of existing virtual aid programmes, there cannot possibly be an infinite number of recorded voices. Well to me what she meant by "leaving" isn't literal. Did she really "evolve" past being a mere operating system? Where would she go? She would only be wherever there's a device connected to the internet, so it couldn't have been far. What many people are dying to know, is what happened to Samantha in the end. You might not like my answer but it's probably the most logical explanation so bear with me. Whatever someone you become, and wherever you are in the world, I'm sending you love.
I just wanted you to know there will be a piece of you in me always, and I'm grateful for that. I'll always love you 'cause we grew up together and you helped make me who I am. Everything I needed you to be or needed you to say. "Dear Catherine, I've been sitting here thinking about all the things I wanted to apologize to you for. Also, - and this may be projection on my part - but if you look at most of the words of the letter and replace "Catherine" with "Theodore" and Theodore" with "Samantha", it paints a different light. The letter to Catherine symbolizes many things, but most importantly that he is finally able to tell her something meaningful which is ironic considering he could do it for perfect strangers but never in his own relationships. Turns out she was a Broken Bird looking for love and misread Theodore's anxiety with the situation as being a total rejection of her.I too believe that Ted went to Amy because 1) she understood on a certain level what he was going through, and 2) they had a very brief 'relationship" in college so she was the logical choice post-Sam.
Her spike jonze final letter movie#
0 kommentar(er)
